<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Website Shows Up Differently in Different Browser!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.enrii.com/2009/07/21/my-website-shows-up-differently-in-different-browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.enrii.com/2009/07/21/my-website-shows-up-differently-in-different-browser/</link>
	<description>A passionate programmer's findings in the world of internet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:27:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix Leong</title>
		<link>http://blog.enrii.com/2009/07/21/my-website-shows-up-differently-in-different-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-85540</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix Leong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 03:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.enrii.com/?p=417#comment-85540</guid>
		<description>For existing sites that&#039;s working, I wouldn&#039;t be bothered. But for new sites, generally using a CSS framework greatly reduce the time to come up with a wireframe and base layout of a site: especially when you plan to have a more complex layout.

It&#039;s really worth checking out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For existing sites that&#8217;s working, I wouldn&#8217;t be bothered. But for new sites, generally using a CSS framework greatly reduce the time to come up with a wireframe and base layout of a site: especially when you plan to have a more complex layout.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really worth checking out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EngLee</title>
		<link>http://blog.enrii.com/2009/07/21/my-website-shows-up-differently-in-different-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-85520</link>
		<dc:creator>EngLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.enrii.com/?p=417#comment-85520</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t tried any CSS frameworks yet. No idea how it would help solve the problem.

My comment on IE6, &quot;No!&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t tried any CSS frameworks yet. No idea how it would help solve the problem.</p>
<p>My comment on IE6, &#8220;No!&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix Leong</title>
		<link>http://blog.enrii.com/2009/07/21/my-website-shows-up-differently-in-different-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-85519</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix Leong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.enrii.com/?p=417#comment-85519</guid>
		<description>One thing is that webpage styling is pain. Recently been more interested in using CSS frameworks like 960.gs and Bluetrip to save the trouble of me making quick wireframes for the site.

There are still things like rounded corners that is a damn pain, as it required a balance between clean markup but with quirky workarounds or having an abundance of filler div tags but achieves 100% compatibility in all browsers.

Even now my site is still only about 80% compatible with IE7&amp;8 and it completely fails in IE6. But I do wonder whether is it worth the trouble to make the rounded corners work with a smaller IE6 audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing is that webpage styling is pain. Recently been more interested in using CSS frameworks like 960.gs and Bluetrip to save the trouble of me making quick wireframes for the site.</p>
<p>There are still things like rounded corners that is a damn pain, as it required a balance between clean markup but with quirky workarounds or having an abundance of filler div tags but achieves 100% compatibility in all browsers.</p>
<p>Even now my site is still only about 80% compatible with IE7&amp;8 and it completely fails in IE6. But I do wonder whether is it worth the trouble to make the rounded corners work with a smaller IE6 audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
