<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trying Safari on Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.enrii.com/2008/04/07/trying-safari-on-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.enrii.com/2008/04/07/trying-safari-on-windows/</link>
	<description>A passionate programmer's findings in the world of internet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:27:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EngLee</title>
		<link>http://blog.enrii.com/2008/04/07/trying-safari-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-72711</link>
		<dc:creator>EngLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.enrii.com/2008/04/07/trying-safari-on-windows/#comment-72711</guid>
		<description>I have uninstalled it. Useless, I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have uninstalled it. Useless, I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frozensmilz</title>
		<link>http://blog.enrii.com/2008/04/07/trying-safari-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-72708</link>
		<dc:creator>frozensmilz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 05:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.enrii.com/2008/04/07/trying-safari-on-windows/#comment-72708</guid>
		<description>I have tried safari on windows.....they boast the html processing power is higher than opera...but i feel opera is much more better since they came up with the idea of tabbed browsing before firefox and IE. and also its lightweight when compared to firefox in memory consuption. Again safari goes for the looks which i dont feel that striking...since its only a web browser.....the lack of addons...like we can get in firefox makes it not quiet flexible in terms of power browsing. ....By the way...Safari didnt crashed..but worked fine in my Xp system...i used it for quite a long and uninstalled it..........no use !.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried safari on windows&#8230;..they boast the html processing power is higher than opera&#8230;but i feel opera is much more better since they came up with the idea of tabbed browsing before firefox and IE. and also its lightweight when compared to firefox in memory consuption. Again safari goes for the looks which i dont feel that striking&#8230;since its only a web browser&#8230;..the lack of addons&#8230;like we can get in firefox makes it not quiet flexible in terms of power browsing. &#8230;.By the way&#8230;Safari didnt crashed..but worked fine in my Xp system&#8230;i used it for quite a long and uninstalled it&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.no use !.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wong</title>
		<link>http://blog.enrii.com/2008/04/07/trying-safari-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-61161</link>
		<dc:creator>wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.enrii.com/2008/04/07/trying-safari-on-windows/#comment-61161</guid>
		<description>I tried before as well... It just DON&#039;T work well with Windows, forget about Safari for Windows</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried before as well&#8230; It just DON&#8217;T work well with Windows, forget about Safari for Windows</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
