Comments on: 2005 Year-end Google Zeitgeist http://blog.enrii.com/2005/12/21/2005-year-end-google-zeitgeist/ A passionate programmer's findings in the world of internet. Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:27:18 -0400 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: EngLee http://blog.enrii.com/2005/12/21/2005-year-end-google-zeitgeist/comment-page-1/#comment-434 EngLee Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:10:30 +0000 http://blog.enrii.com/2005/12/21/2005-year-end-google-zeitgeist/#comment-434 Yes, the stat is supposed to be on searches in year 2005, rather than all searches up to year 2005. :) Err.. I think that "sex" might not be the top, only those sexy celebrities! ;) Yes, the stat is supposed to be on searches in year 2005, rather than all searches up to year 2005. :)

Err.. I think that “sex” might not be the top, only those sexy celebrities! ;)

]]> By: toydi http://blog.enrii.com/2005/12/21/2005-year-end-google-zeitgeist/comment-page-1/#comment-433 toydi Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:59:29 +0000 http://blog.enrii.com/2005/12/21/2005-year-end-google-zeitgeist/#comment-433 My first guess was the 'sex' word would be on top in Google Top Gainers. Hmm.. but I think since it states as "Google.com - Top Gainers of 2005", maybe they decided to exclude all the "permanent top winners" from the list of search? :P My first guess was the ‘sex’ word would be on top in Google Top Gainers.

Hmm.. but I think since it states as “Google.com – Top Gainers of 2005″, maybe they decided to exclude all the “permanent top winners” from the list of search? :P

]]>